skyscript.co.uk
   

home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
Register
FAQ
Search
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
Lilly's Considerations
compiled by D. Houlding
Book II of Carmen Astrologicum by Dorotheus
translated by David Pingree
Compiled by Deborah Houlding
The Babylonian Astrolabe: the Calendar of Creation, by Rumen K. Kolev
Reviewed by Gill Zukovskis

Skyscript Astrology Forum

arabic parts - a modern take

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Philosophy & Science
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
james_m



Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 1722
Location: vancouver island

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:49 pm    Post subject: arabic parts - a modern take Reply with quote

http://astrosoftware.com/ArabicParts.htm

this morning i read in the trad section on the 'lots combust' thread some comments that i am responding to here, since - haha - i can comment on lihins comments without the burden of having to keep it trad.

lihin points to a review on amazon of zollers book on the arabic parts
http://www.amazon.com/Arabic-Parts-Astrology-Lost-Prediction/dp/0892812508
by a fellow named kristopher streeter who would like to suggest it is impossible to entertain a metaphysical viewpoint in modern times, or something to that effect. first off, i think that is presumptuous and naive to suggest that, but i want to highlight an article much more modern in context which i think addresses some of the thrust of lihin's comments in a head on manner..

i think the divisive talk on the differences between medieval and modern thinking suggested by the reviewer of zollers book are false and don't really help in to broaden ones understanding of arabic parts.. i do believe cochranes article at the top go a long way to gaining a better understanding on their relevance in a modern context.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tzadde



Joined: 07 Apr 2011
Posts: 137

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The formula for the third Arabic Part that can be constructed with the Sun, Moon, and Asc is Sun+Moon-Asc. When I first began experimenting with this Arabic Part, I called it the Part of Integration but then I noticed that it was already listed in my software and has the name Part of Retribution, and this Arabic Part is attributed to al Biruni. I have not yet researched al Biruni's work [...]

In Al Biruni's The Book of Instructions in the Elements of the Art of Astrology, there is no such formula. The Part of Retribution is actually Asc + Sun - Mars in nocturnal charts, conversely in diurnal ones.

What the author was looking for is the Lot of Basis, which is the shortest distance between Fortune and Spirit, although is not making any geometric shape with Asc, Sun and Moon.
_________________
Amor ordinem nescit.
Love does not know order.
- Saint Jerome -
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Philosophy & Science All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

       
Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated