skyscript.co.uk
   

home articles forum events
glossary horary quiz consultations links more

Read this before using the forum
Register
FAQ
Search
View memberlist
View/edit your user profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Recent additions:
Godfather of Modernity: The Alan Leo Legacy Vol. One - Early Astrological Journals 1890-1912, compiled by Philip M Graves
Reviewed by Deborah Houlding
Lilly's Considerations
compiled by D. Houlding
Book II of Carmen Astrologicum by Dorotheus
translated by David Pingree
Compiled by Deborah Houlding
The Babylonian Astrolabe: the Calendar of Creation, by Rumen K. Kolev
Reviewed by Gill Zukovskis

Skyscript Astrology Forum

Notes on Tetrabiblos and sectby season

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Traditional (& Ancient) Techniques
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
damon



Joined: 23 Sep 2012
Posts: 419

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:01 pm    Post subject: Notes on Tetrabiblos and sectby season Reply with quote

I was looking at the tetrabiblios and here are a few things that flashed through my mind.
On 9. On the fixed signs he mentions things like “the stars on the feet of Gemini, or the thigs of Gemini etc” suggest he used constellations or sidereal zodiac.

On exaltations, he says Mars is at its most fiery in Capricorn. This is very different from the modern tradition which claims Mars in Capricorn is disciplined,cold, controlled.

But most important, people talk about planets in sect and tend to ignore season, of which he talks about too.
Saturn is in sect in day chart, but is a different Saturn the one in the Winter and the one in Summer, In the latter it would be even more in sect in my view.
But nothing is said about this and many people ignore it due to the Southern hemisphere controversy.
Suffice to say that in oriental astrologies, it is the sign representing season,rather than the season,that matters

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lihin



Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 470
Location: Mount Kailash

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:24 am    Post subject: Non-issue during Ptolemy's lifetime Reply with quote

Good morning,

The main development of ancient Hellenistic astrology took place when the equal signs of a tropical zodiac (northern hemisphere) rather closely corresponded to the same-named unequal astronomic constellations. Hipparchos' definitions of the equal tropical signs from about 150 BCE included each Alpha Star of the same-named constellation in the corresponding sign. So it is not surprising that it is difficult to ascertain in many cases whether Hellenistic astrological authors referred to signs (tropical and/or 'sidereal'), constellations or both.

Meanwhile, from a strictly geocentric perspective, the 'sphere' of fixed stars has advanced counter-clockwise nearly 30 degrees of ecliptical longitude.

Before replying about Ptolemy's text concerning season and sect, your would much oblige, Damon, by citing book and chapter numbers as well as which translation you have used.

Best regards,

lihin
_________________
Non esse nihil non est.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> Traditional (& Ancient) Techniques All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

       
Contact Deborah Houlding  | terms and conditions  
All rights on all text and images reserved. Reproduction by any means is not permitted without the express
agreement of Deborah Houlding or in the case of articles by guest astrologers, the copyright owner indictated