Sect applied to Gauguelin data

[damon]

http://cura.free.fr/09-10/1004doug6.pdf

They show an impressive qualitative agreement with Sect theory
for MA, VE, SA, and MO, as indicated by the number of comments in green, but
much less agreement for the case of JU. It is worth noting here that although JU
was considered more diurnal than SA by the classical astrologers, a nocturnal
JU was seen as less damaging than a nocturnal SA or a diurnal MA, (Hand 1995:
22-23). This would not imply that it was actually stronger at night of course, so
there is a question mark over the character of JU among eminent professionals,
in relation to Sect. As the ancients recognised in the cases of MA and SA,
efficacy is not necessarily equivalent to intensity of a planetary influence, and it
may be that eminent professionals also require some moderation of the JU
effect to avoid failures caused by over-confidence.