Could you have the same Heliacal rising star for 5,385 years

1
Hi all,
As most know with Precession a star moves one degree every 72 years, so how can you have the same Heliacal rising star for 5,385 years?

Actually you can up to 9,300 BC.

Please debate and then i will explain, it does seem impossible, but is possible.

Look below on Starlight between 20 July 3805 BC
and 20 July 1581 AD and Sirius was the heliacal rising star in Rome, it only stopped then because the next year the Gregorian Calendar was established.

https://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/ ... 51f8c2.png
https://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/ ... 51f871.png
You would think my program was wrong but there is an answer
Look how much Leo moves, but Sirus always rises with the Sun
https://www.space.fm/astronomy/planetar ... ssion.html
Spinal injury gives lots of time for research.
Other interests include the paranormal.

2
Thanks Archi for the info!
My guess given in the article is that...
"The effects over the course of a precession cycle on observing is that the celestial poles move and all stars therefore shift ever so slightly from one year to the next."
Blessings!

3
Ouranos wrote:Thanks Archi for the info!
My guess given in the article is that...
"The effects over the course of a precession cycle on observing is that the celestial poles move and all stars therefore shift ever so slightly from one year to the next."
Hi Ouranos,

Sirius isn't the only star to do this, but it is the brightest which makes it special, and it is this reason that it was used as a calendar star, but it only works with the Julian Calendar.

I'm pasting the quote needed below:-

"Mechanics

The ancient Egyptian civil year, its holidays, and religious records reflect its apparent establishment at a point when the return of the bright star Sirius to the night sky was considered to herald the annual flooding of the Nile.[2] However, because the civil calendar was exactly 365 days long and did not incorporate leap years until 22 BCE, its months "wandered" backwards through the solar year at the rate of about one day in every four years. This almost exactly corresponded to its displacement against the Sothic year as well. (The Sothic year is about a minute longer than a Julian year.)[2] The sidereal year of 365.25636 days is only valid for stars on the ecliptic (the apparent path of the Sun across the sky) and having no proper motion, whereas Sirius's displacement ~40° below the ecliptic, its proper motion, and the wobbling of the celestial equator cause the period between its heliacal risings to be almost exactly 365.25 days long instead. This steady loss of one relative day every four years over the course of the 365-day calendar meant that the "wandering" day would return to its original place relative to the solar and Sothic year after precisely 1461 Egyptian civil years or 1460 Julian years.[1] "

The error in the Julian Calendar are three leap days every 4 hundred years which is also applied to Sirius!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sothic_cycle#Mechanics
Spinal injury gives lots of time for research.
Other interests include the paranormal.

4
The ancients built stone circles, many show Equinox's and Solstices, it would seem by video below that Sirius was viewed by a roof box in Newgrange in Ireland.

It is open to debate if ancient people knew that 365 days were a year and perhaps added a leap day every four years by viewing Sirius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWXvJv9sgR8

I know i am speculating but could the same be true for Gobekli Tepe?

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1307/1307.8397.pdf

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg ... -dog-star/
Spinal injury gives lots of time for research.
Other interests include the paranormal.

6
Archaeoastronomer wrote:The ancients built stone circles, many show Equinox's and Solstices, it would seem by video below that Sirius was viewed by a roof box in Newgrange in Ireland.

It is open to debate if ancient people knew that 365 days were a year and perhaps added a leap day every four years by viewing Sirius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWXvJv9sgR8

I know i am speculating but could the same be true for Gobekli Tepe?

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1307/1307.8397.pdf

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg ... -dog-star/
Interesting, thanks for sharing!

I read Denisovan Origins by Andrew Collins and Greg Little and I do think they made a strong case for Göbekli Tepe being aligned with Deneb. However, at this stage, it seems wise to keep an open mind to all possibilities.

What intrigues me most about the site, though, is that it presents us with depictions of zodiacal constellations - going back much further in history than the Mesopotamians! Martin Sweatman's Prehistory Decoded is an excellent - if preliminary - study of the topic.
_________________

Visit my blog:
https://michaelsternbach.wordpress.com/